用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

WE ARE COMMITTED TO REPORTING THE LATEST FORESTRY ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

基于群决策和层次分析法的城市绿地园林植物综合评价体系构建及应用——以成都市主城区为例

Construction and application of comprehensive evaluation system for urban green space garden plants based on group decision-making and analytic hierarchy process: a case study of Chengdu main urban area

  • 摘要: 开展城市绿地植物评价,科学合理地选择园林植物,使其充分发挥生态、社会、景观等多种功能和效益,对于城市生态文明建设具有重要意义。如何选择更加全面的评价指标,构建城市绿地植物综合评价体系显得十分必要。提出了一套指标筛选、综合评价体系构建的方法,并以成都市主城5区的290种绿地园林植物(其中乔木116种,灌木(含藤本)88种,草本(含竹类)86种)为例进行了应用。研究结果如下:(1)在指标的选择上,首先通过文献查找、专家咨询,采用“头脑风暴法”初选了6个准则层(生物学特性、景观价值、生态功能、生态适应性、文化经济功能、造林管护成本)50个指标;然后邀请20名专家,采用德尔菲法对初选指标进行三轮筛选,最终选出35个指标,构建起城市绿地园林植物评价指标体系。(2)在综合评价模型的构建上,采用群决策和层次分析法相结合的方法。①邀请18名专家对6个准则层、35个指标的重要性分别进行打分,采用层次分析法构建判断矩阵,计算每个专家的个体权重;②将专家个体权重作为标准进行系统聚类,根据不同专家所在类别中的专家数量来计算权重系数。将个体权重与专家权重系数进行线性加权,计算得到评价对象的群体权重;③基于相关研究和专家咨询结果,对每个指标建立1~5分的等级评价标准。根据等级评价标准,通过查阅相关参考文献以及征求专家意见,获得各参评对象各指标的得分值,最后将群体权重和评价对象的得分值进行加权求和,得到评价对象的综合评价分。(3)对成都市主城5区的绿地园林植物评价结果为:乔木综合得分3.5以上的占比为52.59%,灌木(含藤本)综合得分3.0以上的占比为68.18%,草本(含竹类)综合得分2.8以上的占比为80.23%;5个主城区的加权综合评价得分70.46~71.04分,说明成都市的绿地园林植物应用处于中等偏上水平。研究成果可为城市绿地植物综合评价体系构建提供方法参考,也可为成都建设“公园城市示范区”进程中园林植物的选用和景观的营建提供科学依据和实践参考。

     

    Abstract: Carrying out the evaluation of urban green space plants, scientifically and rationally selecting garden plants to enable them to give full play to their multiple functions and benefits such as ecology, society, and landscape, is of great significance to the construction of urban ecological civilization. How to select more comprehensive evaluation indicators and construct a comprehensive evaluation system for urban green space plants is particularly necessary. This study proposed a set of methods for indicator screening and comprehensive evaluation system construction, and applied them to 290 species of green space garden plants in 5 main urban districts of Chengdu (including 116 arbor species, 88 shrub species (including vines), and 86 herb species (including bamboos)). The results were as follows: (1) In terms of indicator selection, this study first preliminarily selected 6 criteria (biological characteristics, landscape value, ecological function, ecological adaptability, cultural and economic functions, afforestation and management costs) and 50 indicators through literature review, expert consultation, and the "brainstorming method". Then, 20 experts were invited to screen the preliminary indicators through three rounds of the Delphi method, and finally 35 indicators were selected to construct the evaluation indicator system for urban green space garden plants. (2) For the construction of the comprehensive evaluation model, this study adopt a combination of group decision-making and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). ① 18 experts were invited to score the importance of the 6 criteria layers and 35 indicators respectively. The AHP was used to construct judgment matrices, and the individual weight of each expert was calculated. ② The individual weights of experts were taken as the standard for systematic clustering, and the weight coefficients were calculated according to the number of experts in the category where different experts belong. The individual weights were linearly weighted with the expert weight coefficients to obtain the group weights of the evaluation objects. ③ Based on relevant research and expert consultation results, a 1-5 point graded evaluation standard was established for each indicator. According to the graded evaluation standards, the score of each indicator for each evaluated object was obtained by consulting relevant references and seeking expert opinions. Finally, the group weights and the scores of the evaluation objects were weighted and summed to obtain the comprehensive evaluation score of the evaluation objects. (3) The evaluation results of green space garden plants in the 5 main urban districts of Chengdu were as follows: among arbors, 52.59% had a comprehensive score of 3.5 or above; among shrubs (including vines), 68.18% had a comprehensive score of 3.0 or above; among herbs (including bamboos), 80.23% had a comprehensive score of 2.8 or above. The comprehensive evaluation scores of the 5 main urban districts ranged from 70.48 to 71.04 points, indicating that the application of green space garden plants in Chengdu was at an above-average level. The results of this study can provide methodological reference for the construction of a comprehensive evaluation system for urban green space plants, and also offer scientific basis and practical reference for the selection of garden plants and the construction of landscape in the process of building "Park City Demonstration Zone" in Chengdu.

     

/

返回文章
返回